Inner Space Fake As Outer Space

Inner Space Fake As Outer Space

The inner space is as fake as outer space! And how you can come to this conclusion? The same CGI videos are using for the bacteria, viruses and germs as for the outer space. It's all fake people! Show me a real video shot from high-tech microscope and I'll believe it's true. Until then, they are the same used from Hubble telescope.

A new conspiracy?

As flat earthers, we know that “outer space” is fake. All you have to do is a search on Google to see the thousands of CGI images.

Do a search on Google for: pictures of viruses, images of viruses What do you come up with? All I see is CGI and artistic pictures. Is there a connection? I think so.

The reason I say “viruses” is that these are supposedly the smallest images. We have electron microscopes, so why can't we see pictures of them? Well, the fact is, that viewing in an electron microscope it's only grey images of what looks like bumps. So, how do they know how the inside of a virus is?

By looking at videos, they are all computer generated. It looks like Hollywood special effects; like a Star Trek ship flying through space. How can the scientists make this claim when nothing is found? Never, never has a virus been isolated; never has a virus been photographed.

There are cells and bacteria but that is on a larger scale and that is something different altogether. You can see them with a good dark field microscope, which isn't nearly as strong an an electron microscope. Are we being lied to? Think of the constant news we are being fed by the media of viruses throughout the years. There was the SARS, West Nile, Bird Flu, all the way back to the Polio, which we were told was caused by viruses. Compare this to the NASA photos we are shown about stars and planets. You can't see a TV news station without seeing the spinning Earth in the background. We are constantly being bombarded with these images. Now, it's with CV.

Each year, we have the “flu season” where we are told about the virus; get your flu shots. A virus had to be created to support the idea of vaccination; vaccines are suppose to fight viruses. The pharmaceutical industry is built, on part, by selling vaccines.

Look at the second video here. Though everyone knows that these are animations, but they are to represent that which is true. Well, how do scientists know that they are true unless they observed them? They can't photograph them because they don't exist! We are shown “photos” of surfaces of planets but this is all created as there are such thing but points of light.

Have you ever look through a telescope at, Jupiter, for example, and compare that to what we are told it looks like? They don't match! What you see in books and the internet are artist renditions. Why is it with the pictures we are shown, never, ever, look like what we see through the strongest telescope? The reason is, that all these “planets” are nothing but wandering stars – points of light. This same con is being done to us with viruses, too!

No virus of the H5N1 or H1N1 has been isolated

No virus of the H5N1 or H1N1 has been isolated

If no virus of the H5N1 been isolated, has ANY virus been isolated AND shown to be able to reproduce?

An open letter to Professor John Oxford, world renowned influenza virologist

I am writing to you because you appear to be the UK expert on viruses and particularly on pandemic viruses such as bird flu H5N1 or swine flu H1N1. I first came across you on the TV show “Pandemic” broadcast on the BBC on Tuesday 7th November 2006. Since then I have heard you on Irish and British radio on a number of occasions.

I have a simple question for you: Can you name a scientific publication where a scientist has isolated, biochemically characterised and photographed the H1N1 virus or the H5N1 virus?

I’m sure you are aware of Dr Stefan Lanka from Klein-Klein-Aktion. He has published three papers concerning a virus he isolated called the ectocarpus silculosus virus. This virus is not pathogenic and neither are the millions of viruses that exist in just one liter of sea-water! The publications are listed below:

Title: A Virus Infection in the Marine Brown Alga Ectocarpus siliculosus (Phaeophyceae) Authors: D.G. Müller, H. Kawai, B. Stache, and S. Lanka, Botanica Acta 103 (1990) 72-82

Title: Genome Structure of a Virus Infecting the Marine Brown Alga Ectocarpus siliculosus Authors: Stefan T.J. LANKA, Michael KLEIN, Uwe RAMSPERGER, Dieter G. MÜLLER, and Rolf KNIPPERS, Virology 193, 802-811 (1993)
Title: Coat Protein of the Ectocarpus siliculosus Virus, Authors: Michael KLEIN, Stefan T.J. LANKA, Rolf KNIPPERS, and Dieter G. MÜLLER; Virology 206, 520-526 (1995).

These scientific papers demonstrate the techniques Dr Lanka used to isolate this virus and are reproducible. In other words, if the H1N1 virus and the H5N1 virus actually do exist, you Professor Oxford should be able to either name a scientific publication proving their existence or isolate these viruses yourself using the techniques applied by Dr Lanka.

Kalpana Chauhan from the Customer Service Centre at the Department of Health in England provided me in July 2006 with some scientific papers which allegedly proved the existence of the mumps, measles and rubella viruses. Susanne Brix from Klein-Klein-Aktion examined these papers and nowhere do the authors of these papers claim to have isolated these viruses. This was pointed out to Kalpana Chauhan but she cut off our correspondence in August 2006.

These are the eight scientific papers provided by Kalpana Chauhan:

Immuno-Electron Microscopy of the Morphogenesis of Mumps Virus.
Hemadsorption of Mumps Virus Examined by Light and Electron Microscopy.
Electron microscopy of the development of rubella virus in BHK-21 cells.
Electron Microscopy of Monkey Kidney Cell Cultures Infected with RubellaVirus.
Antibody-induced capping of measles virus antigens on plasma membrane studied by electron microscopy.
Electron Microscopic Study on the Development of Measles Virus in Cultured Cells.
Fine Structure of Cellular Inclusions in Measles Virus Infections.
Observations of Measles Virus Infection of Cultured Human Cells: A study of Development and Spread of Virus Antigen by Means of Immunofluorescence.
These scientific papers do not prove that the mumps, measles and rubella viruses actually exist. Perhaps Professor Oxford you can examine them yourself and I believe you will agree that these papers do not prove the existence of the mumps, measles and rubella viruses. Please do so.

I have published all this correspondence in my book The Ultimate Conspiracy: The Biomedical Paradigm.

Professor Oxford I accept that it is your opinion and that of your colleagues that pathogenic viruses such as H1N1 and H5N1 exist. I am now well aware of your expert opinion from your numerous TV and radio broadcasts. What I am interested is the primary evidence on which any expert such as you should base his opinion.

As Lord Nimmo Smith said in an excellent judgment:

“But however often a conclusion may be repeated, it is only as sound as the research on which it is based, and of this I have seen none.”

If this primary evidence is readily available, as it should be, if the case for the existence of these pathogenic viruses is so self-evident, it should be possible for you Professor John Oxford to provide me and more importantly Dr Stefan Lanka with the relevant scientific publications. If you cannot do so, then you must publicly state why this is not possible.

Why do we vaccinate against viruses that we cannot prove to exist, even though it is technically possible to isolate real viruses (which are harmless) and it would be also possible to isolate pathogenic viruses if they actually existed?

However often Professor Oxford you proclaim about the dangers of pandemics caused by fictitious viruses your opinions and conclusions and assertions are only as strong as the research on which they are based.

Please produce two primary references that you can publicly defend, where the H5N1 virus and H1N1 virus have been isolated, biochemically characterised and photographed.

Yours Sincerely
James McCumisker
Belfast, Ireland

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20091243.htm

Results of Inoculation for Polio of Children

Results of Inoculation for Polio of Children

Papers and discussions presented at the Second International Poliomyelitis Conference

Over 70s Need to Self-isolate

Over 70s Need to Self-isolate

From the UK, 15 March

Ministers are planning to give police the power to arrest people with coronavirus who are not self-isolating, the Health Secretary has confirmed.

Matt Hancock said “we will stop at nothing” in tackling the Covid-19 outbreak as he detailed a series of severe measures the Government is considering.

Bars, restaurants and shops other than supermarkets and pharmacies could be shut while over-70s will be asked in the coming weeks to stay indoors for up to four months, he said.

Mr Hancock also confirmed a report that emergency legislation being drawn up by the Government will include allowing police the power to arrest infected citizens.

I hope that the people are not sheeple and actually do this. I hope they all go about their business in force. Time will tell what happens...

I would not be surprised is the government says after the people are out of self-isolation that they have to go back again because they got “reinfected,” or some such nonsense. As you know, man's laws are built on shifting sand; always changing, no standard.

Coronavirus: All Nations Are In On It

Coronavirus: All Nations Are In On It

One claim by Mike Adams that the Coronavirus is real is, “That it's ruining the Chinese economy; that it has effected Iran and Italy.” He goes on to add why would all these countries get involved if it wasn't real. Good question.

Well, like all major conspiracies, just about all nations participate in it. As flat Earth believers, we know that other nations are covering up the truth. Proof of that is that Russia has a 'space station;' China has flown rockets into 'outer space;' other countries have shot up rockets. But we know from the Bible, the laws of physics that such is not the case.

We know that the Moon landing was a hoax, yet do you hear Russian opening its mouth about it? No!

We know that evolution is a hoax, yet all the text books in schools and universities push the evolution hoax. This should tell you that they are all in or it for whatever reason. So, why wouldn't they for this Coronavirus?

Yes, businesses are losing money but that doesn't mean they are all in on as the governments are. Some businesses, yes, but others no. they are just a victim as you and me. However, some of these companies will be getting bailed out. You've heard it before - “too big to fail.” The fact is, that nearly all government leaders and the rich that support them are members of the same secret societies. What is decided in these secret lodges goes. The agenda are many and they share in it.

In 1929 the stock market crashed. The wealthy knew about it – those in the inner circle – but that is what they wanted. A year or two later they bought stocks at 10 cents on the dollar. So, this is what I expect will happen again. Think of stock of airlines, hotels and those affected by the Coronavirus. Some people will increase their investments 5 fold, 10 fold.

The Great Depression was not just in the US, but in Europe, too. This was a worldwide conspiracy yet how many people knew about it then? How many people know about it now? Not many.

What all governments love is, more control over the people. What do certain rich people want? More power. They have enough money, so now they'll get more power – along with more money. So, by other nations told to go along, is something that has been done before, nothing new.

The Coronavirus meets other agendas, too, that would not be possible without it, such as:

• reducing the world population
• more control over natural resources
• more money for pharmaceutical companies
• eliminating the opposition by saying they died of the virus, etc.

Need I say more?

Definition of the word virus before it was changed

Definition of the word virus before it was changed

Webster's Shorter School Dictionary. 1927. virus, n. The poison of an infectious disease.

Thorndike Century Dictionary. 1935. 1. venom.2. A poison produced in a person suffering from a disease, as small-pox virus.

Webster's New Practical Dictionary. 1951. 1. venom. 2. The poison matter of a disease, as the virus of small-pox.

Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English language. 1957. virus. 1. venom. 2. A poison that is produced in the body by a disease.

"A poison that is produced in the body by a disease." The poison that is produced by the body in every disease is the infection or mucus. The mucus or infection is the virus. The infection or the mucus is also the result of disease. The infection or mucus is what they make their vaccine out of. So they make there vaccine out of the result of disease not the cause of disease. This is isopathy which means the product of disease will prevent disease. Isopathy was coined in 1823 by Dr. Joesph Lux. Dr. Lux named it after Jenner who died in 1823. I would say it was a tribute from one quack to another.

Let's think about this poison that the body produces in a diseased state. Using the true definition of the word virus, read that as small-pox pus. The pus is the poison produced by the body in the disease called small-pox.

Jonas Salk said vaccination is easy to understand. The vaccine is made from the virus that caused the disease. As you can see from the above true definitions Salk was deceptively referring to the infection of the disease. He was making his vaccine out of the result of disease, not the cause. He knew better. Edward Jenner, the man who is credited with the filthy practice of vaccination in the 1800s used the pus from the smallpox lesion and said if placed in the belly of a cow and then placed the cow pus in the arm of a healthy person, that it would prevent smallpox. Jenner was a buffoon, He didn't know the difference between cause and effect. Salk was a clever guy. He knew.

Today all vaccines are still made from the result of a disease and claimed falsely to prevent disease. This is why the medical profession hasn't cured anybody in 2000 years. It is like saying a cancerous tumor is the cause of itself and then making a vaccine out of the cancer infection and claiming it will prevent cancer. Does that make sense--of course not-it is ridiculous. The real scientific term is not vaccination-nobody uses cow pus anymore--it's Isopathy which means the product of disease will prevent disease. How stupid is that?

​Martinus Beijerinck called his tobacco leaf experiment a slimy liquid. Latin is a dead language, it doesn't change its definition. Thomas Rivers in 1927 began to change the meaning of virus to today's B.S. definition.

*****

Martinus Beijerinck and Ivanovski. The author credits these two men with the discovery of the virus. These are the men who took dying tobacco leaves, ground them up into a liquid, ran them through a filter, then injected the poison into the leaves of YOUNG GROWING plants and when the plants changed color, declared that something in the poison came alive and attacked the plants. How frecking stupid was that?

It is dangerous to be right on a subject which the established authorities are wrong. -Voltaire

This page with the so-called polio virus was taken from a book written by Alton Blakeslee in 1956. Blakeslee was a press writer for the Associated Press. The book covered every detail on how Jonas Salk made his polio vaccine. Every detail but one. The source of the so-called virus was not named. See the source below under Simon Flexner. It was ground up spinal cord from a human child. No I am not kidding.

The first and only question to ask yourself is if they couldn't see the virus how did they know it existed?

How stupid were the medical men of that period?