Showing posts with label truth about medical viruses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label truth about medical viruses. Show all posts

Sunday, 22 March 2020

Coronavirus: More People Are Waking Up


Coronavirus: More People Are Waking Up


By looking at the comments to news articles, I see more and more people waking up. Even the police are waking up.

There was an article where police were complaining about not having protective gear. If this continues, what do you think they will do? Let them go to make it “look” like they are doing their job. If they get sick, who will do the policing? If they are home, who will protect the so-called Elite from the angry mobs? You can say “ditto” about the soldiers, too.

People are connecting the dots. They know that a city-wide or country-wide quarantine is not done with the flu or pneumonia; it's not done with other illnesses, so why with the Coronavirus? People are realising that there are hundreds of thousands that actually die from Cancer, but the hospitals seem to take care of this but when people are tested positive for the Coronavirus, the hospital beds seem to be over-flowing? Strange!



Friday, 20 March 2020

No virus of the H5N1 or H1N1 has been isolated

No virus of the H5N1 or H1N1 has been isolated

If no virus of the H5N1 been isolated, has ANY virus been isolated AND shown to be able to reproduce?

An open letter to Professor John Oxford, world renowned influenza virologist

I am writing to you because you appear to be the UK expert on viruses and particularly on pandemic viruses such as bird flu H5N1 or swine flu H1N1. I first came across you on the TV show “Pandemic” broadcast on the BBC on Tuesday 7th November 2006. Since then I have heard you on Irish and British radio on a number of occasions.

I have a simple question for you: Can you name a scientific publication where a scientist has isolated, biochemically characterised and photographed the H1N1 virus or the H5N1 virus?

I’m sure you are aware of Dr Stefan Lanka from Klein-Klein-Aktion. He has published three papers concerning a virus he isolated called the ectocarpus silculosus virus. This virus is not pathogenic and neither are the millions of viruses that exist in just one liter of sea-water! The publications are listed below:

Title: A Virus Infection in the Marine Brown Alga Ectocarpus siliculosus (Phaeophyceae) Authors: D.G. Müller, H. Kawai, B. Stache, and S. Lanka, Botanica Acta 103 (1990) 72-82

Title: Genome Structure of a Virus Infecting the Marine Brown Alga Ectocarpus siliculosus Authors: Stefan T.J. LANKA, Michael KLEIN, Uwe RAMSPERGER, Dieter G. MÜLLER, and Rolf KNIPPERS, Virology 193, 802-811 (1993)
Title: Coat Protein of the Ectocarpus siliculosus Virus, Authors: Michael KLEIN, Stefan T.J. LANKA, Rolf KNIPPERS, and Dieter G. MÜLLER; Virology 206, 520-526 (1995).

These scientific papers demonstrate the techniques Dr Lanka used to isolate this virus and are reproducible. In other words, if the H1N1 virus and the H5N1 virus actually do exist, you Professor Oxford should be able to either name a scientific publication proving their existence or isolate these viruses yourself using the techniques applied by Dr Lanka.

Kalpana Chauhan from the Customer Service Centre at the Department of Health in England provided me in July 2006 with some scientific papers which allegedly proved the existence of the mumps, measles and rubella viruses. Susanne Brix from Klein-Klein-Aktion examined these papers and nowhere do the authors of these papers claim to have isolated these viruses. This was pointed out to Kalpana Chauhan but she cut off our correspondence in August 2006.

These are the eight scientific papers provided by Kalpana Chauhan:

Immuno-Electron Microscopy of the Morphogenesis of Mumps Virus.
Hemadsorption of Mumps Virus Examined by Light and Electron Microscopy.
Electron microscopy of the development of rubella virus in BHK-21 cells.
Electron Microscopy of Monkey Kidney Cell Cultures Infected with RubellaVirus.
Antibody-induced capping of measles virus antigens on plasma membrane studied by electron microscopy.
Electron Microscopic Study on the Development of Measles Virus in Cultured Cells.
Fine Structure of Cellular Inclusions in Measles Virus Infections.
Observations of Measles Virus Infection of Cultured Human Cells: A study of Development and Spread of Virus Antigen by Means of Immunofluorescence.
These scientific papers do not prove that the mumps, measles and rubella viruses actually exist. Perhaps Professor Oxford you can examine them yourself and I believe you will agree that these papers do not prove the existence of the mumps, measles and rubella viruses. Please do so.

I have published all this correspondence in my book The Ultimate Conspiracy: The Biomedical Paradigm.

Professor Oxford I accept that it is your opinion and that of your colleagues that pathogenic viruses such as H1N1 and H5N1 exist. I am now well aware of your expert opinion from your numerous TV and radio broadcasts. What I am interested is the primary evidence on which any expert such as you should base his opinion.

As Lord Nimmo Smith said in an excellent judgment:

“But however often a conclusion may be repeated, it is only as sound as the research on which it is based, and of this I have seen none.”

If this primary evidence is readily available, as it should be, if the case for the existence of these pathogenic viruses is so self-evident, it should be possible for you Professor John Oxford to provide me and more importantly Dr Stefan Lanka with the relevant scientific publications. If you cannot do so, then you must publicly state why this is not possible.

Why do we vaccinate against viruses that we cannot prove to exist, even though it is technically possible to isolate real viruses (which are harmless) and it would be also possible to isolate pathogenic viruses if they actually existed?

However often Professor Oxford you proclaim about the dangers of pandemics caused by fictitious viruses your opinions and conclusions and assertions are only as strong as the research on which they are based.

Please produce two primary references that you can publicly defend, where the H5N1 virus and H1N1 virus have been isolated, biochemically characterised and photographed.

Yours Sincerely
James McCumisker
Belfast, Ireland

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20091243.htm


Virus Mania

Virus Mania


With this Coronavirus endless reporting and that this is a pandemic that will kill millions of people, there is no proof that viruses exist. Yes, people get sick and they die, and that includes what is happening now. But, is it from some virus?

Read this report about AIDS, and what really killed these people. Click Here

Thursday, 19 March 2020

Results of Inoculation for Polio of Children

Results of Inoculation for Polio of Children

Papers and discussions presented at the Second International Poliomyelitis Conference


Sunday, 15 March 2020

Definition of the word virus before it was changed


Definition of the word virus before it was changed



Webster's Shorter School Dictionary. 1927. virus, n. The poison of an infectious disease.

Thorndike Century Dictionary. 1935. 1. venom.2. A poison produced in a person suffering from a disease, as small-pox virus.

Webster's New Practical Dictionary. 1951. 1. venom. 2. The poison matter of a disease, as the virus of small-pox.

Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English language. 1957. virus. 1. venom. 2. A poison that is produced in the body by a disease.

"A poison that is produced in the body by a disease." The poison that is produced by the body in every disease is the infection or mucus. The mucus or infection is the virus. The infection or the mucus is also the result of disease. The infection or mucus is what they make their vaccine out of. So they make there vaccine out of the result of disease not the cause of disease. This is isopathy which means the product of disease will prevent disease. Isopathy was coined in 1823 by Dr. Joesph Lux. Dr. Lux named it after Jenner who died in 1823. I would say it was a tribute from one quack to another.

Let's think about this poison that the body produces in a diseased state. Using the true definition of the word virus, read that as small-pox pus. The pus is the poison produced by the body in the disease called small-pox.

Jonas Salk said vaccination is easy to understand. The vaccine is made from the virus that caused the disease. As you can see from the above true definitions Salk was deceptively referring to the infection of the disease. He was making his vaccine out of the result of disease, not the cause. He knew better. Edward Jenner, the man who is credited with the filthy practice of vaccination in the 1800s used the pus from the smallpox lesion and said if placed in the belly of a cow and then placed the cow pus in the arm of a healthy person, that it would prevent smallpox. Jenner was a buffoon, He didn't know the difference between cause and effect. Salk was a clever guy. He knew.

Today all vaccines are still made from the result of a disease and claimed falsely to prevent disease. This is why the medical profession hasn't cured anybody in 2000 years. It is like saying a cancerous tumor is the cause of itself and then making a vaccine out of the cancer infection and claiming it will prevent cancer. Does that make sense--of course not-it is ridiculous. The real scientific term is not vaccination-nobody uses cow pus anymore--it's Isopathy which means the product of disease will prevent disease. How stupid is that?

​Martinus Beijerinck called his tobacco leaf experiment a slimy liquid. Latin is a dead language, it doesn't change its definition. Thomas Rivers in 1927 began to change the meaning of virus to today's B.S. definition.

*****

Martinus Beijerinck and Ivanovski. The author credits these two men with the discovery of the virus. These are the men who took dying tobacco leaves, ground them up into a liquid, ran them through a filter, then injected the poison into the leaves of YOUNG GROWING plants and when the plants changed color, declared that something in the poison came alive and attacked the plants. How frecking stupid was that?


It is dangerous to be right on a subject which the established authorities are wrong. -Voltaire


This page with the so-called polio virus was taken from a book written by Alton Blakeslee in 1956. Blakeslee was a press writer for the Associated Press. The book covered every detail on how Jonas Salk made his polio vaccine. Every detail but one. The source of the so-called virus was not named. See the source below under Simon Flexner. It was ground up spinal cord from a human child. No I am not kidding.

The first and only question to ask yourself is if they couldn't see the virus how did they know it existed?

How stupid were the medical men of that period?