Latin Meaning For Virus

Latin Meaning For Virus

Martinus Beijerinck called his tobacco leaf experiment a slimy liquid. Latin is a dead language, it doesn't change its definition. Thomas Rivers in 1927 began to change the meaning of virus to today's B.S. definition.

No One Has Seen A Living Virus

No One Has Seen A Living Virus

Another CGI, just like how our "solar system" is made. I bet that guy at NASA is busy!

"The electron microscope is capable of revealing details as much as 1000 times smaller than visible in light microscopes because the wavelengths of electrons are much shorter than those of light. Transmission electron microscopes make it possible to explore cell structures and large protein molecules. Because beams of electrons pass through thin samples, cells and tissues MUST BE CUT INTO THIN SLICES BEFORE THEY CAN BE EXAMINED UNDER THE MICROSCOPE. With scanning electron microscopes, a pencil like beam of electrons is scanned over the surface of a specimen. For images, specimens do not have to be cut into thin slices to be visualized. The scanning electron microscope produces scanning three-dimensional images of cells. Because electrons are easily scattered by molecules in the air, samples examined in both types of electron microscopes must be placed in a vacuum in order to be studied. As a result, researchers chemically preserve their samples first and than remove all the water before placing them in the microscope. THIS MEANS THAT ELECTRON MICROSOPY CAN BE USED TO VISUALIZE ONLY NON-LIVING PRESERVED CELLS AND TISSUES."

One doesn't have to be a scientist or doctor to understand the way an electron microscope works. Any intelligent 10 year old can understand the words, THIS MEANS THAT ELECTRON MICROSCOPE CAN BE USED TO VISUALIZE ONLY NON-LIVING PRESERVED CELLS AND TISSUES."

No one has EVER seen a live virus or antibody, because they don't exist. It is all a scam promoted by Thomas Rivers,M.D. in 1927. The word virus is from the Latin and means poison. Here is the evidence of what the virus really is and where it comes from. The virus that was promoted as the cause of polio and other diseases was just the poison or infection taken from a person or animal with a disease. The poison or infection was not the cause of itself --it was the result of disease and therefore cannot be a prevention or cure of a disease.

Straight from the liars who taught the virus lie to everybody.

And there is your "live virus." The pus of a smallpox sore. Poison.

Mike Adams; How to deal with pandemic deniers

Mike Adams; How to deal with pandemic deniers

  First, I would like to make a comment to those who think why I'm spending so much time in correcting Mike Adams' errors. Why don't I just ignore him? Good question.

The reason why I write about Mike Adams is very important. Since he is not just another Leftist where you would not give the time of day, Adams is someone who does have a huge following of Patriots because he talks against the NWO. So these people might be taken in on what he says about the Coronavirus, too.

It's also good to know what your critic says so you can answer back intelligently. This is important. So, when I hear that we should not comment on what critics say, I say that it's all the more reason to do so. The exception would be if the person was a real nutter.

Click Here for the audio.

If you didn't listen to the audio, that's fine – I'll give a summary here.

Mike Adam has a 10 minute talk (the rest is his ad) on how to answer deniers of the Coronavirus. Well, I'm here to say how to answer believers of the CV. He talks about exponential grow of the virus but he uses an example of bacteria growing in a Petri dish. He talks about how bacteria can fill a Petri dish in one minute but most of the growth (spreading) comes in the last 2 minutes of a 60 minute experiment. Fine, we can understand this.

However Adams comes to the wrong conclusion, and so could be anyone you meet that believes in all this Coronavirus cr*p. He then talks about “deniers” have only three options. They are:

He says that the only way to stop CV is to shut down all transportation, travel, and public events; to self-quarantine.

“So, how do you stop this? We don't have any anti-CV vaccines, and if we did, they probably won't work.” Well, the fact is, that it's guaranteed they won't work. Mike has been a big advocate of anti-vaccines, and now he says, “...might not work.”

Adams does admit that you can probably beat this with natural supplements, with antiviral herbs. He says that most people don't know about this – which I agree. So, he continues that it will spread like crazy.

Mike says a good question to ask deniers is, “How does a virus stop?” He says there are only three ways to have this stop:

1 is to have anti-viral (natural medicine or drugs); that everyone is taking them.

2 another way is extreme social isolation; no work, no grocery shopping, total isolation

3 or that it burns through the whole population and kills a percentage of the population; then, whoever is left surviving is immune.

Adams concludes that this is the only three ways that it stops. “Ask your friend these questions and if they don't give you one of these three answers, then they are really not informed about the topic.”

They will probably say, the government will do something. Then he says ask how the government will solve it and they probably say they don't know. He says that it comes to the deniers saying they hope it stops. I agree with what deniers will say, but the believers in the Coronavirus say the same thing. Look at all the believers of the Bird Flue, West Nile Flu, etc., they stopped, too and if asked why they say they don't know, it just did.

Adams say that the deniers will just say that they hope it stops. But hope does not stop a virus.

He goes on to give some examples in history, such as the Spanish Flu - hope did not stop that. However, what Adams fails to mention is that it DID STOP. But neither he nor anyone else knows why – they just are glad that it did.

There are other causes throughout history of plagues just stop, such as the Black Plague in the Middle-Ages. Well, I'll tell you how it stops later. First I want to comment on Adams saying the people have just three choices.

Now, this is a tactic to control the conversation. The fact is they should have another choices that he picks! But you can't give another choice if you are ignorant of it.

Now, back to the main point – how does pandemics/epidemics stop? How did the Spanish Flu stop?

To find out lets take a look at the common cold. When a person gets sick, he has mucus, he coughs, etc. The bacteria multiplies; it grows exponentially. But, one day the person wakes up and he feels better. How is that? If bacteria of whatever kind that brings a person who is well makes him come down with a cold, how is it that a weaker person, a person that has more of this bacteria in him not continue to make him sicker and sicker until he is totally consumed and die? Why doesn't this happen.

Most people have never thought of this, they are just glad that they got well. But think about it, IF what we are told by doctors is true, then no one would get well once they get sick. This should tell you that their hypothesis is wrong, yet we all believe this.

In other words, what should be ask (to those who believe the Coronavirus is true or not), people can't figure out how a well person gets sick and how a sick person gets well when the “bad” bacteria count is so high. They, including Adams, just ignore it and go on their merry way.

Now, you can apply this to CV. Adams, and others think, that if the virus is not contained, million will die and the rest will survive; they somehow build up an immunity to it. Well, why would the rest survive if there are millions of deaths? With CV “on a roll,” it should be that much easier for the rest of us to get it. Why didn't the infected build up an immunity? How can those that survive build up an immunity to it if it was the first time being exposed? How can a person even build up an immunity when never exposed to it? The fact is, this is not how bacteria breeds. When I studied Natural Hygiene back in the 1980's, we were told this.

As a side note, the highest selling diet book of all time in America, at the time of publication, was a book by Harvey and Marilyn Diamond called, Fit For Life. They also took the came college course I did; this is where they got the information for their book. If you get a chance to read it, please do so. Continuing...

Let's take an analogy of flies and a bin. If you substitute bacteria for flies and the body for a bin (garbage can), you'll understand. Does a bin itself attack flies or is it the condition of the bin? It's the condition of the bin. If you have a bin that is filled up with kitchen waste, you'll attract flies. More flies come, more flies breed and the number gets higher. But, in time, when all the rotten food is consumed, the flies disappear. In this case, they fly off somewhere else.

If you bin is kept clean (your body) you will not have flies (get sick in the first place). Bacteria ONLY spreads when the food for them is present (mucus and other waste products). Once this happens, the bacteria dies off and there is only a residual amount left.

With any epidemic/pandemic the bacteria dies off. Those that are health (do not have enough waste in the body); they do not get sick in the first place. With the Spanish Flu, when millions died, why didn't it just continue? Apparently, Adams believes the same lies as the doctors do, in this case, in that it spreads. If that is the case, theoretically, it should have continued but it didn't. We should thank God that He created the kinds of bacteria He did, otherwise we would be killed with the first multiplication of bacteria. We get sick because of violation of certain fundamental laws of nature. Sickness is really a healing crises. Once all the waste cells and excretions they created is eliminated, the bacteria dies off and this waste is excreted, too.

There is more that I can write about concerning the CV but I will have to save that for another article, specifically about what viruses really are is not what we are told.

Fear of the Invisible

Fear of the Invisible

An investigation of viruses and vaccines, HIV and AIDS

by Janine Roberts, Bristol: Impact Investigative Media Productions, 2nd ed., 2009, 314 pages


• Germ theory of disease
• Vaccine hazards and toxins
• Have viruses been isolated?
• HIV/AIDS: a deadly scandal
• Cells, viruses and health


In Fear of the Invisible, investigative journalist Janine Roberts describes her 12-year exploration of many fields of ‘big medicine’. Beginning as a firm believer in the official theory of harmful viral invaders and the effectiveness of vaccines, she was dismayed by what she discovered, and eventually arrived at a broader and very different perspective on the causes of disease. She writes:

We have been taught to greatly fear viruses, yet scientists have long known that these are fundamental parts of life, made by the millions by all healthy cells. I hope this book will help by combating this fear, this damning of the invisible because we do not understand it. Without this fear, hopefully the focus in medical research will shift to the environmental toxins that really do put us, and our world, gravely at risk. (p. xi)


Germ theory of disease

The prevailing view today is that major illnesses are caused by microbes – i.e. bacteria and viruses. One of the first advocates of this ‘germ theory’ was Girolamo Fracastoro of Venice, who in 1546 blamed diseases on minute, rapidly multiplying, infectious organisms. Since the microscope had not yet been invented, his theory could not be substantiated. The microscope was invented in the 17th century and led to the discovery of the cell, and also of bacteria – singled-celled microorganisms which, since they have no cell nucleus, are classed as prokaryotes.



 
Bacteria are typically a few micrometres (thousandths of a millimetre) in length, while
viruses range from 10 to 300 nanometres (millionths of a millimetre) in diameter.


The terms ‘virus’ and ‘vaccination’ were first used in the 18th century. Cows (‘vacca’ in Latin, hence ‘vaccination’) suffer from a mild form of smallpox called cowpox, and a scientist called Edward Jenner heard of a rural belief that people who got cowpox never seemed to be affected by the much more serious smallpox. So he took pus from an open sore on the hand of a milkmaid whose cow had cowpox, and injected it into his gardener’s son in the hope that it would protect him against smallpox. He called the pus his ‘virus’, a Latin word meaning ‘poisonous fluid’. He claimed it was pure and uncontaminated, but we now know it would have contained many kinds of microbes and toxins.

In 1800 a doctor attacked Jenner’s method because of its failures, but Jenner claimed that these must be due to contaminated needles being used to inject his cowpox virus. The UK government made his smallpox vaccine compulsory in 1853, but thousands of parents preferred to be fined or imprisoned rather than give it to their children, as it frequently produced illness. Although Jenner is credited with inventing vaccination, he had learned of it from a milkmaid. The Chinese had practised something similar, but somewhat subtler, for 3000 years: they recommended sniffing powdered smallpox scabs to induce immunity to smallpox.

In the 19th century, Louis Pasteur further developed the germ theory. His description of microorganisms in milk led to the ‘pasteurization’ process named after him. He was also given credit for developing anthrax, cholera and rabies vaccines, and researched how to reduce the virulence of ‘germs’ for use in vaccines. Another French scientist, Antoine Béchamp, had actually discovered that airborne microorganisms caused fermentation in wine and milk six years before Pasteur, and accused him of plagiarism. Instead of seeing these microorganisms primarily as our enemies, he stressed their emergence from our own cells and their value to us, regarding them as the consequence of disease and cell death rather than their cause. Pasteur put more emphasis on their role in illnesses and received credit for establishing the germ theory, but he too depicted bacteria primarily as useful.

The prevailing modern idea of microbes as pathogenic invaders that we must destroy at any cost owes a lot to the Prussian physician Robert Koch, who was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1905 for linking tuberculosis (TB) to a mycobacterium. He formulated the four ‘Koch postulates’ which are still taught today and embody his belief that there is one microbe per disease: 1. the microbe must be present in every case of the disease; 2. the microbe must be isolated from the host and grown in vitro (i.e. in the laboratory); 3. the disease must be produced when a pure culture of the microbe is inoculated into a healthy susceptible host; 4. the same microbe must be recovered from the experimentally infected host. However, Koch found it difficult to fulfil all four postulates. We now know that nearly everyone has the tuberculosis mycobacterium in them, along with fungi that cause a deadly pneumonia (PCP), and countless other microbes, but they are normally harmless unless our immune system is impaired by other factors.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis. (en.wikipedia.org)


Koch rightly criticized Pasteur’s description of liquid samples taken from diseased patients as ‘isolates’ of particular microbes, saying that they could not possibly contain only one kind of pathogen. For instance, he wrote of the Pasteur rabies vaccine: ‘Pasteur is content to inoculate with slime taken from the nose of the dead animal, which, exactly like saliva, was certainly contaminated with many other bacteria’ (p. 43). He also noted that different bacteria could cause similar disease symptoms.

In 1909 Karl Landsteiner and Erwin Popper began their hunt for the cause of polio, in response to major epidemics of paralytic polio in Sweden and the United States. They were unable to find a bacterium to blame so they guessed that there must be minute forms of bacteria able to pass through all available filters. They called them ‘mini-bacteria’ and ‘viruses’. Viruses are about a billionth of the size of a cell, and anything equally small will pass through the filters with them, including DNA and RNA fragments, proteins, prions (infectious agents composed mainly of protein), mycoplasmas (tiny parasitic bacteria lacking a cell wall), and chemical toxins. This problem of isolating or purifying viruses is crucial to the rest of this story. Most viral ‘isolates’ are little more than filtered cell cultures containing many contaminants, in which a particular virus is presumed present.

In 1931 the electron microscope was invented. When tiny particles were seen in fluid from sick people, they were called viruses. When they were seen surrounding and entering damaged cells, they were assumed to be infecting the cells and causing the cell damage. We now know that healthy cells communicate with one another by exchanging particles known as exosomes, microvesicles and retroviruses; they carry genetic material which is then absorbed by the recipient cell. Cells under stress try to defend themselves by mutating, and the exchange of viral-like particles is part of this process. This shows the need for caution in interpreting such images. But, as we shall see, scientists have failed to exercize such caution and have built the theory of pathogenic viruses on very flimsy evidence.

The Truth About the Coronavirus

The Truth About the Coronavirus

  I will be posting many articles that cover the Corona Virus ( Coronavirus, Covid 19,however they spell it now). Since this is important news now and that there is much misleading information, people got to know that there is an alternative. It's up to you to decide. What you'll read here is unlike what you'll read elsewhere, including what you hear from alternative health sites.

So, let's get started...

I listened to a 16 minutes audio by Mike Adams talking about some people who think the Coronavirus is a hoax and he compares this to the flat Earth believers. For this article, I would like start on the Coronavirus. In part 2, I'll talk about what he says about his comments on flat earthers.

There are some people who don't believe all the hype that we are told about the Coronavirus – including yours truly. In fact, I think that I'm the only flat earther who has written on this. I believe that the coronavirus is a hoax for a number of years. Now, before you get mad at me, listen to what I have to say here, AND stay tuned of what I will be publishing in the next couple of days. As King Salomon said, he that judgeth a matter before he hears it is a fool.

If you recall that over the years we had: Swine Flu, Bird Flu, West Nile, Ebola, ad nauseam. All of this, at the time, we heard of “end of the world scenarios.” And what happened? - it died out and we heard nothing more; we are still here!

All these out brakes, germs spreading, etc. is so people will get mass vaccinated. In order for people to be willing to do this, there has to be some Hollywood pandemic type film that puts fear in everyone.

In 2009, was Swine Flu pandemic. In the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, secretly stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Do you know why? Because all the tests were coming back negative; not only for the Swine Flu, but also for the common flu!

Mike Adams brought up a good question and that is, “If all of this is a hoax, why would China ruin its economy, why would Iran be in or this, why would Italy be in on this?”

Good question and one that needs to be answered.

The reason for this happening in these countries (as well as the rest of the world) is they have something in common. What is that? All government leaders are of the same mind-set, and the few that aren't, can be brought or their life threatened.

If you read about the history of Communism, it has been capitalist countries that have financed them – including Russia and China. But that is another story and a whole book can be written on it (and has been written on it).

In China, where all this started, they would want to see Communism spread over the world. In the US, they want their power and influence spread over the world. Now, these two countries are not at odds with each other; all it is, is a different “hat” they are wearing; they have the same goals in mind.

Leading nations of the world want:

• more control over their people
• an easier way to eliminate their opposition
• a cashless society
• an excuse to take away property of dissenters
• an elimination of the means of self-defence
• a method of reducing world population, i.e. Agenda 21

Do you get the picture? Having a pandemic is a perfect cover-up for all of this. Also, it allows pharmaceutical companies to make 10's of billions more – perhaps a trillion of dollars (collectively).

Look at how few people have died. Look at those who “came down” with the Coronavirus and described it as a flu; now back to work and doing their daily routine. If this was really a contagious virus, we would already have millions dead and millions more sick but we don't have this.

Before you make up your mind, you need to know:

• what “viruses” really are
• what contagion really is
• that you can't “catch” somebody else's poison

It will take a lengthy article to cover each one of them, but in the meantime, here is a start on the Swine Flu fiasco below for your consideration.

Chinese Cover Up

Adams and others say that China had cover up the true number of reported cases; that the actual figures are higher (see the top of naturalnews.com website for this). Adams claims it's because the figures are much higher. But if you read the interview below, the CDC did exactly the same thing with the Swine Flu BECAUSE, reported cases came back NEGATIVE!

I'll cover his remarks about flat Earth believers, which is on the same audio. The link will be in the next post – it's really quite funny but stupid of him to make such claims. So, be sure to read it.