Definition of the word virus before it was changed

Definition of the word virus before it was changed

Webster's Shorter School Dictionary. 1927. virus, n. The poison of an infectious disease.

Thorndike Century Dictionary. 1935. 1. venom.2. A poison produced in a person suffering from a disease, as small-pox virus.

Webster's New Practical Dictionary. 1951. 1. venom. 2. The poison matter of a disease, as the virus of small-pox.

Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary of the English language. 1957. virus. 1. venom. 2. A poison that is produced in the body by a disease.

"A poison that is produced in the body by a disease." The poison that is produced by the body in every disease is the infection or mucus. The mucus or infection is the virus. The infection or the mucus is also the result of disease. The infection or mucus is what they make their vaccine out of. So they make there vaccine out of the result of disease not the cause of disease. This is isopathy which means the product of disease will prevent disease. Isopathy was coined in 1823 by Dr. Joesph Lux. Dr. Lux named it after Jenner who died in 1823. I would say it was a tribute from one quack to another.

Let's think about this poison that the body produces in a diseased state. Using the true definition of the word virus, read that as small-pox pus. The pus is the poison produced by the body in the disease called small-pox.

Jonas Salk said vaccination is easy to understand. The vaccine is made from the virus that caused the disease. As you can see from the above true definitions Salk was deceptively referring to the infection of the disease. He was making his vaccine out of the result of disease, not the cause. He knew better. Edward Jenner, the man who is credited with the filthy practice of vaccination in the 1800s used the pus from the smallpox lesion and said if placed in the belly of a cow and then placed the cow pus in the arm of a healthy person, that it would prevent smallpox. Jenner was a buffoon, He didn't know the difference between cause and effect. Salk was a clever guy. He knew.

Today all vaccines are still made from the result of a disease and claimed falsely to prevent disease. This is why the medical profession hasn't cured anybody in 2000 years. It is like saying a cancerous tumor is the cause of itself and then making a vaccine out of the cancer infection and claiming it will prevent cancer. Does that make sense--of course not-it is ridiculous. The real scientific term is not vaccination-nobody uses cow pus anymore--it's Isopathy which means the product of disease will prevent disease. How stupid is that?

​Martinus Beijerinck called his tobacco leaf experiment a slimy liquid. Latin is a dead language, it doesn't change its definition. Thomas Rivers in 1927 began to change the meaning of virus to today's B.S. definition.

*****

Martinus Beijerinck and Ivanovski. The author credits these two men with the discovery of the virus. These are the men who took dying tobacco leaves, ground them up into a liquid, ran them through a filter, then injected the poison into the leaves of YOUNG GROWING plants and when the plants changed color, declared that something in the poison came alive and attacked the plants. How frecking stupid was that?

It is dangerous to be right on a subject which the established authorities are wrong. -Voltaire

This page with the so-called polio virus was taken from a book written by Alton Blakeslee in 1956. Blakeslee was a press writer for the Associated Press. The book covered every detail on how Jonas Salk made his polio vaccine. Every detail but one. The source of the so-called virus was not named. See the source below under Simon Flexner. It was ground up spinal cord from a human child. No I am not kidding.

The first and only question to ask yourself is if they couldn't see the virus how did they know it existed?

How stupid were the medical men of that period?