Immunity
Vs. Toleration
“Immunization” is
based on the idea that it is possible, by chemical or biological
means, to make a person disease-proof. If this were indeed possible,
it would represent a suspension of the law of cause and effect.
People have been
educated to be terrified of bacteria, to believe implicitly in the
idea of contagion—that specific malevolent aggressive disease germs
pass from one host to another. Even bacteriologists overlook the fact
that, instead of the germ population being divided into specific
“good” germs and specific “bad” germs, “good” germs have
the ability to mutate into “bad” (proliferating and virulent)
germs, when the soil is suitable for this change. Germs have the
ability to modify their structure and function, according to the
environment in which they find themselves.
The idea of vaccination
is that injection of a specific vaccine of lesser virulence is
supposed to confer immunity against a specific disease of greater
virulence. Originally, it was maintained that one injection would
confer lifetime immunity. After that idea failed, the idea of
periodic revaccination was adopted. Read my book, Don’t Get Stuck!,
for the history of the failure of vaccination and the trail of
tragedy it has left in its wake.
Dr. Robert Simpson of
Rutgers University said (March 1976): “Immunization programs
against flu, measles, mumps, and polio may invade the genetic makeup,
and may actually be seeding humans with RNA to form pro-viruses,
which then become latent cells throughout the body. These could be
molecules in search of diseases, which may become activated and cause
a variety of diseases later, such as multiple sclerosis, arthritis,
or even cancer.” While this conjecture is in line with medical
reasoning, it is blatant nonsense. Organisms do not work this way.
Immunity Vs.
Toleration
Sometimes the injection
of a poison into the bloodstream results in toleration of that
poison, which is mistakenly labeled immunity. Toleration means the
body hasn’t sufficient vitality to resist.
The dictionary
definition of tolerance is “the power or ability to endure,
withstand, or resist the effects of a drug or food or other
physiologic insults without showing unfavorable effects.” Actually,
this is contradictory. If the body endures the insult, it is because
of lack of strength to resist. When it resists, it has the energy to
institute defensive action: vomiting, sneezing, diarrhea, fever, or
any crisis of cleansing and healing.
Dr. Shelton says that
toleration is submission; it is broken-down resistance. “The
warning voice of self-protection has gradually been put to sleep,
while the organism is undermined and premature death comes as a
surprise to everyone … Toleration for poisoning is established by
loss of the vitality necessary to resist it. The body pays for this
toleration (miscalled immunity) by general enervation and lowered
resistance to every other influence. … It is a sad day for the body
when it tolerates poisons. … If tolerance for tobacco were never
established, there would be no tobacco users. The same for alcohol,
opium, arsenic, and other poisons. … The repeated use of a poison
gradually overcomes or decreases vital resistance.”
Inoculation Is A
Disease-Producing Process
No vaccine or other
similar preparation can confer immunity against the effects of wrong
living. On the contrary, more (not fewer) diseases are the inevitable
result inoculation with serum and vaccines, which exhaust the
vitality and resistance. Inoculation is a disease-producing process,
which results in injury to organs, the nervous system and the blood.
Serum inoculations and
blood transfusions can dissolve red blood cells in the recipient and
damage the central nervous system, which helps to account for the
enormous numbers of servicemen discharged as insane. (Dr. Shelton’s
Hygienic Review, May 1977, page 200).
In an article published
in the United States Naval Medical Bulletin, May 1, 1943, three naval
officers (physicians reported that inoculations against typhoid,
tetanus, and yellow fever are “epidemiological factors” of
greatest significance in the history of meningococcic meningitis.
They expressed the belief that “immunizing inoculations” may
lower body resistance. The occurrence of seventy eight cases of
cerebrospinal fever was reported among troops in a camp in Natal
after the injection of typhoic vaccine.
The purpose of such
inoculations is to produce specific antibodies against specific
diseases. Dr. Shelton says that if the body produces antibodies when
vaccines and serum are administered, these are the ones required to
protect against the injected substances, and not the specific
antibodies that would be required to protect it against the
contingency of exposure or susceptibility to a specific disease.
The following report
appeared in Vol. 93, No. 6, page 482, of the American Journal of
Epidemiology (observations made by workers conducting a trial of
“flu” vaccine):
“The overall
respiratory illness rates were unaffected by the vaccine.
Infections due to
agents other than the influenza virus accounted for a larger
proportion of illness in the protected (vaccinated) than in the
unprotected groups.”
No comments:
Post a Comment