The Science of Fear, Part 1
Believe it or not,
there is a science of fear that is well developed now. Think of what
is going on now with the Coronavirus; think of your daily news
article. But keep in mind the so-called deadly virus that we are told
is going around.
Quotes
"I have lectured
all over the world... I have always had a special interest in
newspapers. All of them have one thing in common, there is always
some reference made to some epidemic in some part of the world. For
instance, two years ago, one paper referred to a polio epidemic in
Holland. For the past three years, our newspapers have commented on
the diphtheria epidemic in Russia. By these means, the population is
constantly threatened with epidemics, they have been made to fear
them, and the reports always conclude: "Go and get
vaccinated".--Dr Buchwald MD
"Dr. med Martin
Hirte writes on page 20 of his book 'Vaccination--Pro and Contra':
"To create fear among parents to strengthen their motivation to
vaccinate is an important part of the publicity used to promote
vaccinations. A whole branch of research is examining the question:
'What level of fear needs to be created to appear as convincing as
possible?'"---Dr Buchwald (The Decline of Tuberculosis despite
"Protective" Vaccination by Dr. Gerhard Buchwald M.D. p104)
"Yet our medically
controlled Health Boards cook up fake epidemics, create panics for
profit, such as the ones in Kansas City in 1921, Pittsburgh in 1924,
Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington in 1925. An effort was also made
to create a panic in New York in 1925, but due to the open fight
against it by the New York Evening Graphic, the Commissioner of
Health called it off."--Herbert Shelton DC
"Since people
cannot be vaccinated against their will. the biggest job of a health
department has always been, and always will be, to persuade the
unprotected people to get vaccinated. This we attempted to do in
three ways: first by education; second, by fright; and third, by
pressure.
We dislike very much
to mention fright and pressure, yet they accomplish more than
education, because they work faster than education, which is normally
a slow process.
During the months
of March and April we tried education, and vaccinated only 62,000.
During May we made use of fright and pressure, and vaccinated 223,000
people.
Our educational
program consisted of warnings in the daily papers, small-pox posters
on the streets, in stores and factories, special small-pox bulletins
for all large places of employment, and special letters to all large
employers from the health department and the association of commerce,
calling their attention to a threatening small-pox epidemic. The
radio was also made use of in this work.
As the conditions
grew worse, we felt justified in using stronger measures. We had
some good pictures taken of patients suffering from the confluent
type of small-pox, and had posters, showing these pictures,
distributed all over the city. The moving picture theatres
cooperated at this time by issuing warnings on the screen.
The newspapers
published daily the names and addresses of people dying from
small-pox. A second letter was sent to all factories, stores, and
other places of business, informing them of a rapidly approaching
small-pox epidemic, and advising them to have their employees
vaccinated immediately, and thereby prevent a serious financial loss
to the city, which might occur if a real epidemic developed.
At this time the
department was vaccinating thousands of people daily, but there were
still too many who could neither be educated nor frightened into
vaccination. Cases and deaths each amounted to a considerable
number, and we now felt justified in using all of the power a health
officer has, and if that was not enough, to get more.
We sent out a third
letter to all employers requesting them to have all of their
employees vaccinated and at the same time informing them that if a
small-pox case developed in their place of employment in the future
we would consider their place of business a menace to the health of
the community and very likely place the entire establishment under
quarantine until it could be cleaned up and made safe for the public.
Putting this responsibility on the employer drove in thousands of
anti-vaccinationists who could better afford to get vaccinated than
lose their jobs. All employees co-operated very bravely with this
last request, although in a few instances it was necessary to lay off
old, reliable and valuable employees."-----Declaration by Dr
John Koehler, Commissioner of Health of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in an
article in The Wisconsin Medical Journal, November, 1925. (The Facts
against Compulsory Vaccination by H. B. Anderson, 1929.)
[2010 Sept] Pertussis
epidemic? Or Media induced malady? by Hilary Butler Being an
information junkie, I have a huge collection of newspaper articles
about kids with pertussis dating from the late 70's, and... most of
them are vaccinated children. One more recent prominent one was a 10
month, fully vaccinated daughter of a doctor at Middlemore hospital.
Which reminds me of this medical article in which in 1979, while
defending his article the author replied with a situation which
exactly mimics THIS country: I did discover that the only seriously
ill infants were too young to have been vaccinated in any case; and
that these children were threatened by an outbreak of which the onset
and initial spread were entirely among immunised children.
Nothing has changed
in the world of expedient misinformation. Whooping cough is
primarily spread by vaccinated children with undiagnosed infections,
to their unvaccinated siblings, or other children in daycare or
school.
The brown coloured
paragraph (By 1976, the number of cases nationwide had dropped to
1,010 a year, because of what experts say was the widespread use of
the vaccine. But the numbers have increased tenfold since. In
California alone, there have been more than 4,000 cases reported this
year, including nine infants who’ve died – most of them after
being misdiagnosed initially) is typical misinformation, when the
truth is, that because of "observer bias" and the
assumption that all vaccinated children can never get pertussis,
pertussis was constantly diagnosed as something else, until the truth
gradually dawned on everyone, and that TRUTH then permeated the
medical literature. Ironically, the guru of pertussis, Dr James
Cherry, was the first to twig that the problem was blinkered doctors,
not absence of pertussis!
Why did that truth
gradually permeate the medical literature? The whole truth and
nothing but, is never told in the medical literature about
anything......In order to convince the public that pertussis boosters
from cradle to grave is a good idea, you have to have time to concoct
some plausible sounding excuses. As well as allow enough time to
pass, to get away with absolute porkies.
But the mainstream
media will never wake up to the fact that media induced maladies
exist, because they ASSUME that doctors tell the truth, and they
can't be bothered studying the medical literature (or wimp out by
saying they don't have the time).
Even if they did
all the above, I wonder who would in mainstream media would have the
balls to challenge people like Dr Alison Roberts, and demand truth
and accountability?
ON PAST EXPERIENCE, THE
ANSWER WOULD BE "NONE".
No comments:
Post a Comment