Mike Adams; How to deal with pandemic deniers
First, I would like to
make a comment to those who think why I'm spending so much time in
correcting Mike Adams' errors. Why don't I just ignore him? Good
question.
The reason why I write
about Mike Adams is very important. Since he is not just another
Leftist where you would not give the time of day, Adams is someone
who does have a huge following of Patriots because he talks against
the NWO. So these people might be taken in on what he says about the
Coronavirus, too.
It's also good to know
what your critic says so you can answer back intelligently. This is
important. So, when I hear that we should not comment on what critics
say, I say that it's all the more reason to do so. The exception
would be if the person was a real nutter.
Click Here for the
audio.
If you didn't listen to
the audio, that's fine – I'll give a summary here.
Mike Adam has a 10
minute talk (the rest is his ad) on how to answer deniers of the
Coronavirus. Well, I'm here to say how to answer believers of the CV.
He talks about exponential grow of the virus but he uses an example
of bacteria growing in a Petri dish. He talks about how bacteria can
fill a Petri dish in one minute but most of the growth (spreading)
comes in the last 2 minutes of a 60 minute experiment. Fine, we can
understand this.
However Adams comes to
the wrong conclusion, and so could be anyone you meet that believes
in all this Coronavirus cr*p. He then talks about “deniers” have
only three options. They are:
He says that the only
way to stop CV is to shut down all transportation, travel, and public
events; to self-quarantine.
“So, how do you stop
this? We don't have any anti-CV vaccines, and if we did, they
probably won't work.” Well, the fact is, that it's guaranteed they
won't work. Mike has been a big advocate of anti-vaccines, and now he
says, “...might not work.”
Adams does admit that
you can probably beat this with natural supplements, with antiviral
herbs. He says that most people don't know about this – which I
agree. So, he continues that it will spread like crazy.
Mike says a good
question to ask deniers is, “How does a virus stop?” He says
there are only three ways to have this stop:
1 is to have
anti-viral (natural medicine or drugs); that everyone is taking them.
2 another way is
extreme social isolation; no work, no grocery shopping, total
isolation
3 or that it burns
through the whole population and kills a percentage of the
population; then, whoever is left surviving is immune.
Adams concludes that
this is the only three ways that it stops. “Ask your friend these
questions and if they don't give you one of these three answers, then
they are really not informed about the topic.”
They will probably say,
the government will do something. Then he says ask how the government
will solve it and they probably say they don't know. He says that it
comes to the deniers saying they hope it stops. I agree with what
deniers will say, but the believers in the Coronavirus say the same
thing. Look at all the believers of the Bird Flue, West Nile Flu,
etc., they stopped, too and if asked why they say they don't know, it
just did.
Adams say that the
deniers will just say that they hope it stops. But hope does not stop
a virus.
He goes on to give some
examples in history, such as the Spanish Flu - hope did not stop
that. However, what Adams fails to mention is that it DID STOP. But
neither he nor anyone else knows why – they just are glad that it
did.
There are other causes
throughout history of plagues just stop, such as the Black Plague in
the Middle-Ages. Well, I'll tell you how it stops later. First I want
to comment on Adams saying the people have just three choices.
Now, this is a tactic
to control the conversation. The fact is they should have another
choices that he picks! But you can't give another choice if you are
ignorant of it.
Now, back to the
main point – how does pandemics/epidemics stop? How did the Spanish
Flu stop?
To find out lets take a
look at the common cold. When a person gets sick, he has mucus, he
coughs, etc. The bacteria multiplies; it grows exponentially. But,
one day the person wakes up and he feels better. How is that? If
bacteria of whatever kind that brings a person who is well makes him
come down with a cold, how is it that a weaker person, a person that
has more of this bacteria in him not continue to make him sicker and
sicker until he is totally consumed and die? Why doesn't this happen.
Most people have never
thought of this, they are just glad that they got well. But think
about it, IF what we are told by doctors is true, then no one would
get well once they get sick. This should tell you that their
hypothesis is wrong, yet we all believe this.
In other words, what
should be ask (to those who believe the Coronavirus is true or not),
people can't figure out how a well person gets sick and how a sick
person gets well when the “bad” bacteria count is so high. They,
including Adams, just ignore it and go on their merry way.
Now, you can apply this
to CV. Adams, and others think, that if the virus is not contained,
million will die and the rest will survive; they somehow build up an
immunity to it. Well, why would the rest survive if there are
millions of deaths? With CV “on a roll,” it should be that much
easier for the rest of us to get it. Why didn't the infected build up
an immunity? How can those that survive build up an immunity to it if
it was the first time being exposed? How can a person even build up
an immunity when never exposed to it? The fact is, this is not how
bacteria breeds. When I studied Natural Hygiene back in the 1980's,
we were told this.
As a side note, the
highest selling diet book of all time in America, at the time of
publication, was a book by Harvey and Marilyn Diamond called, Fit
For Life. They also took the came college course I did; this is
where they got the information for their book. If you get a chance to
read it, please do so. Continuing...
Let's take an
analogy of flies and a bin. If you substitute bacteria for flies
and the body for a bin (garbage can), you'll understand. Does a bin
itself attack flies or is it the condition of the bin? It's the
condition of the bin. If you have a bin that is filled up with
kitchen waste, you'll attract flies. More flies come, more flies
breed and the number gets higher. But, in time, when all the rotten
food is consumed, the flies disappear. In this case, they fly off
somewhere else.
If you bin is kept
clean (your body) you will not have flies (get sick in the first
place). Bacteria ONLY spreads when the food for them is present
(mucus and other waste products). Once this happens, the bacteria
dies off and there is only a residual amount left.
With any
epidemic/pandemic the bacteria dies off. Those that are health (do
not have enough waste in the body); they do not get sick in the first
place. With the Spanish Flu, when millions died, why didn't it just
continue? Apparently, Adams believes the same lies as the doctors do,
in this case, in that it spreads. If that is the case,
theoretically, it should have continued but it didn't. We should
thank God that He created the kinds of bacteria He did, otherwise we
would be killed with the first multiplication of bacteria. We get
sick because of violation of certain fundamental laws of nature.
Sickness is really a healing crises. Once all the waste cells
and excretions they created is eliminated, the bacteria dies off and
this waste is excreted, too.
There is more that I
can write about concerning the CV but I will have to save that for
another article, specifically about what viruses really are is not
what we are told.
No comments:
Post a Comment