The Germ Theory Of Disease
In light of the
Coronavirus, we need to understand what contagion really is. This
article will help.
Acceptance of the
concept of contagion is contingent on acceptance of the germ theory
of disease. The germ theory of disease is the reigning premise upon
which is superimposed a tremendous network of modern medical
procedures.
Simply stated, this is
the germ theory: Diseases are due solely to invasion by specific
aggressive microscopic organisms; that is, a specific germ is
responsible for each disease; and microorganisms are capable of
reproduction and transportation outside of the body.
The germ theory was
founded on the assumption that disease germs are specific and
unchangeable in their biological structure and chemical
characteristics.
Dr. Rene J. Dubos
(eminent modern bacteriologist and 1968 Pulitzer Prize winner)
contradicted this assumption by showing that the virulence of
microbial species is variable.
Pasteur himself
admitted his mistake (around 1880). Dr. Dudaux, a coworker of
Pasteur, wrote that, when nearly sixty years of age, Pasteur
discovered facts which were not in accord with his previous
conception that disease germs were unchangeable. Pasteur found that
microbial species can undergo many transformations, which discovery
destroyed the basis for the germ theory.
Dramatic Proof That
Germs Do Not Cause Disease
Reports in the Journal
of Infectious Diseases, 1914. Vol. 14, pages 1 to 32, describe
experiments by E. C. Rosenow, M.D., of the Mayo Biological
Laboratories in Rochester, Minnesota. It was demonstrated that
streptococci (pus germs) could be made to assume all the
characteristics of pneumococci (pneumonia germs) simply by feeding
them on pneumonia virus and making other minor alterations in their
environment. When the procedure was reversed, they quickly reverted
to pus germs. In all cases, regardless of the type of germs, they
quickly mutated into other types when their environment and food were
changed.
Two New York City
bacteriologists, through similar experiments, converted cocci (round,
berry-shaped) into bacilli (long, rod-shaped) and vice versa.
So it is obvious that
specific bacteria do not produce specific disease symptoms—it is
the environment and the type of soil which determines the type of
bacteria that proliferate.
Pasteur Becomes
Identified As Originator Of Germ Theory
The first “Germ
Theory of Infectious Diseases” was published in 1762, by M. A.
Plenciz, a Viennese physician. In 1860, Louis Pasteur took the credit
for the experiments and ideas of others, “plagiarizing and
distorting their discoveries,” according to Dr. Leverson of
England. Because of Pasteur’s strength, zeal, enthusiasm, and
convincing personality, and his passionate determination to overcome
opposition to the germ theory, he became identified as its
originator.
Claude Bernard
(1813-1878) disputed the validity of the germ theory, and maintained
that the general condition of the patient’s body was the principal
factor in disease, but this idea was largely ignored by the medical
profession and the general public. Pasteur had done his work well as
the suave promoter of a plausible “scientific” hypothesis that
could bolster the prestige of the sagging medical profession. Bernard
and Pasteur had many debates on the relative importance of the
microbe and the internal environment.
Pasteur was a chemist
and physicist, and knew very little about biology and life processes,
but he was a respected and influential man. His phobic fear of
infection, his belief in the “malignity” and “belligerence”
of germs, and his powerful influence on his contemporaries, had
far-reaching consequences, and men of science were convinced of the
threat of the microbe to man. Thus was born the period of
bacteriophobia (fear of germs) which still exists.
The Fear Of Infection
The fear of “infection”
of a cut, a bruise, or other injury is widespread. Actually, there is
more danger from the drugs and antibiotics administered to “prevent
infection.” When an injury occurs, the body quickly seals off the
area, a scab forms, and repairs are instituted. Suppuration rarely
occurs, except in toxic individuals. Devitalizing drugs serve to
hinder the cleansing and reparative processes; antibiotics destroy
friendly bacteria.
Patients do not have
much (or any) choice in the use of antibiotics after surgery. The
massive invasive process of surgery (often opening into the body
cavity) is quite different from a cut or other wound near the surface
of the body. In any event, there is no option. The antibiotics (after
surgery) are mandatory (for the “protection” of the surgeon).
No comments:
Post a Comment