Must I Be Immunized?
Note: Keep this
in mind when you hear about the Coronavirus, immunized and vaccines.
by Virginia Vetrano,
B.S., D.C.
Worried people call the
Health School asking if they should have themselves immunized before
traveling abroad. They are going to the Far East or Mexico, and
should they beware of fresh fruits and vegetables? Is it true that
they must drink wine or beer, and shun pure water?
These and other
questions come to their mind when preparing for a visit to other
countries. They have heard so many scare stories written by the
masters of the scare science that they take a trip with great fear
and trepidation. Indeed, some remain home for, fear of “catching”
some foreign “bug.”
On January 4, 1971, the
Arkansas Gazette carried an article by Dr. Van Dellen alarming the
people that a cholera epidemic was spreading through the Middle and
Far East, into Africa. “For the first time in 100 years the disease
has bridged the Sahara and is in tropical Africa and as far west as
Guinea. These areas are densely populated and have poor
sanitation—ideal conditions for the spread of the infection. The
mortality also has been high.
He goes on to say that
the cholera poses “no immediate threat to the United States,” but
he says this “with his fingers crossed, because any person visiting
afflicted countries could bring it back.” Then those stow-away
germs could pounce on us poor unsuspecting Americans who would then
succumb to the disease.
Where was the cholera
vibrio all these years? Did it disappear and suddenly return?
Travelers are advised to consult the United States Public Health
Service to determine which countries demand that they be immunized
for cholera before entering, making it sound as if many countries
demand immunization for this disease before crossing their frontiers.
This is not so. Dr. Van Dellen states in the aforementioned article
that, “Many countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa demand evidence
of vaccination before a person crosses their frontiers. And this is
true particularly after the person has been in a cholera-infected
area.”
I telephoned the United
States Public Health Service and was told that it is not necessary to
be immunized before going into an infected area; that the countries
did not care if you were subjected to the disease when there. It is
the other countries that worried when you re-entered them on your way
home. I was advised that before making a world trip that one should
be immunized for smallpox, cholera, yellow fever, tetanus, typhoid,
polio, and hepatitis. Then one month before entering a
malaria-infested area I was told to start taking medication and
continue taking it as long as there was a chance of being bitten by
the malaria-carrying mosquito.
The World Health
Organization, Geneva, is the responsible body for the International
Sanitary Regulations. It is clear in Article 83, for all those
countries that accept the International Sanitary Regulations, that
“objectors to vaccination can refuse the operations without being
refused admission into those countries which have accepted the
International Sanitary Regulations.”
If you have traveled
into Asia, Africa, America, other than from the United States and
Canada, and wish to enter the United Kingdom, an official vaccination
certificate is necessary. In almost all countries, however, you can
get in without shots of any kind. It is when you re-enter other
countries from an infected area that trouble may be given you.
Paul-Emile Chevrefils, M.D., founder president of La Ligue Pour Le
Vaccine Libre states that he travels without the yellow certificate,
using only Article 83. He states that, “This international by-law
gives anyone the right to go around the world by using the medical
surveillance for 15 days, not to be isolated but to go freely.“
After informing his
readers that “there is no good evidence that cholera immunizations
are any good …” Fredrick J. Stare, M.D. (Arkansas Gazette,
November 16, 1970) urges us to be shot anyway, and then gives us a
formula for eating that will supposedly prevent cholera. Do what he
says and you probably will develop cholera. Do the exact opposite of
his advice which follows and you will probably have more energy,
enjoy yourself more and not be troubled whatsoever with “vacation
diarrhea.”
Stare, according to the
dictates of the infection myth, gives us this advice: Stick to
bottled mineral water, hot tea or coffee, or bottled beer, eat the
meat, potatoes, rice, or other well-cooked foods, canned vegetables,
bread, butter, and jam; and shun the fruits and vegetables unless you
can readily peel them yourself. Wash your hands well before you eat.”
This nonsensical plan
of eating supposedly prevents the development of cholera by killing
the vibrio with heat or chemical processes before introducing it into
the body via food and water. Were the vibrio the cause of cholera his
reasoning would still be specious. Vibrio cholerae are aerobic
bacteria, meaning that air is necessary for their growth. There is
not an excess of air in the gastrointestinal system. They are also
killed by acidity. If food and water, contaminated by vibrio cholera
are taken, the acid of any good stomach will soon destroy them.
Kendall A. Elson, M.D. states in Cyclopedia of Medicine, that, “The
cholera vibrio escapes from the body of the infected individual in
stools and vomitus, although if the latter is strongly acid the
organisms are immediately killed.”
What people should be
taught is cleanliness, and to eat moderately of properly-combined
foods so that digestion is normal and they need not fear the cholera
vibrio, if they still believe the concept of disease of the shaman.
We must caution our readers against Stare’s Middle Ages advice. The
cholera vibrio does not cause cholera.
Even though he has
twice made the statement that cholera immunizations do not protect
one from cholera, Stare advises getting immunized anyway to avoid
trouble at ports of entry to other countries which have strict public
health regulations. He condemns his peers, who are M.D.s who give the
shots when he says, “It is important to have this certificate in
order to avoid inconveniences in travel or the threat of serum
hepatitis from a dirty vaccinating needle.”
To back up his
statements about cholera vaccine, Stare quotes Dr. W. B. Greenough,
III, whom he says “knows far more about cholera than I know or ever
will know,” as having written him the following: “Many commercial
vaccines do not protect even in populations from endemic areas (where
cholera is always present) … as a measure for disease control
immunization is ineffective since the carrier state is not interfered
with by the vaccine.”
What he is saying in
plain English is that if the cholera vaccine protected, then cholera
would not be endemic, and those who were protected would not develop
the disease even if supposed “carriers” are present. However, we
are taught that the “organisms usually disappear from the stools of
the cholera patient within five to seven days of the onset of
infection. …” and the carrier state is not supposed to be a
significant method of transmission of the disease. Cecil and Loeb’s
textbook of medicine states “there are no known instances of
chronic carriers among human beings.”
Many Hygienists have
traveled to the Middle and Far East and into Africa, eating plenty of
fresh fruits and vegetables, without developing any trouble, whereas
often those who had all the shots and who drank wine instead of water
and who didn’t dare taste a fresh fruit or vegetable came down with
various illnesses, including cholera. I might add, that for the sake
of cleanliness, pure distilled water would be best to drink, here or
overseas, and for absolute cleanliness of vegetables and fruits,
rinse them well in distilled water. The cholera vibrio is easily
killed by drying, and it dies rapidly in pure water. It is
cleanliness that is necessary, not sterility.
Cholera, an acute
inflammation of the intestinal canal, is supposedly spread by food
and water contaminated with vibrio cholerae. It is usually a disease
endemic and epidemic in Asia primarily along the Ganges River in
India and Pakistan. The bacillus, which is shaped like a comma, and
was called the comma bacillus by Koch, its discoverer, releases a
powerful endotoxin after death, which contains a mucinase. Mucinase
is thought to be responsible for the extreme cellular desquamation of
the mucosal epithelium that is so characteristic a feature of
cholera. The endotoxin supposedly causes such intense dilatation of
all the capillaries along the whole intestinal tract that the fluid
leaks out of these into the intestines, thus producing the rice-water
stools so typical of Asiatic cholera. Because of the loss of such
huge quantities of electrolytes and water, extreme dehydration
ensues, and Boyd states that 75% of the untreated patients die.
Since the vibrio
cholera does such horrible things to a person, by all means,
shouldn’t we take steps to prevent infection? These threats could
scare one into being immunized despite the poor reports of
immunization, before going to the Middle and Far East. Who wants to
dehydrate and die? So we become immunized and avoid all fresh foods,
hoping that we won’t develop the disease.
Germs by themselves do
not cause disease. Dr. Pettenkofer, Professor of Bacteriology at the
University of Vienna, astounded all his students one day by drinking
a glass of water containing millions of living cholera bacilli. He
had come to the conclusion that germs do not cause disease, and
wanted to prove it. As he gulped down a glassful of living vibrio,
the bearded Dr. Pettenkofer only growled, “Now let us see if I get
cholera.” De Kruif said that Dr. Pettenkofer drank enough of the
“wiggling comma germs to infect a regiment.” Nothing happened to
the “mad” Pettenkofer. Many incidents could be cited showing that
infecting the body with germs does not cause any specific disease to
develop. Perhaps this is why the president was persuaded to dump
stockpiles of germs for germ warfare. Perhaps experiments proved them
useless and physicians didn’t want the lucrative germ theory
destroyed just yet. If germ warfare were effective, it is hardly
likely that he would have disposed of the stockpile.
As far back 1928, Dr.
M. Beddow Dayly, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., Medical World, said: “I am
prepared to maintain, with scientifically established facts, that in
no single instance has it been conclusively proved that any
microorganism is the specific cause of a disease.”
In Volume VI of the
Hygienic System, Dr. Shelton says: “In more than sixty years of
intensive farming the germ idea, there is not one ‘disease’ that
has been proved to be of germ origin, and not one can be cured
according to the germ theory. Unless a germ will cause a disease
every time it infects the body, it is not a cause. A cause must be as
constant and specific in its influence, or it is not a cause. Germs
are omnipresent—this is one of the fundamental truths Pasteur or
his contemporary, Bechamp, discovered; but he and his followers
appear to have overlooked the fact that germs fail to have a specific
influence all the time.”
Dr. Shelton further
says: “The view I would put before the reader is that ‘disease’
is not caused by the germ, but by the state of the body that allows
the germ to flourish. And this condition of the organism or any part
of it which renders possible the growth of the germ therein is the
much sought for ‘filterable virus.’ It is the outgrowth of
violations of the laws of life and is no chance or haphazard
condition.”
Dr. Tilden says that
germs are merely adventitious—secondary. If the soil is proper for
the growth of bacteria, they will flourish but if tissues and
secretions are normal and healthy, pathological germs will not grow
and multiply.
Those who travel and
drink alcoholic beverages, smoke, keep late hours, overeat on spicy,
cooked dishes, and sight-see until they are about to drop are
enervating themselves. They are using up nerve energy in excess.
Functions begin to lag. Metabolic waste products mount in the tissues
and fluids of the body. Secretion and excretion are impaired. This is
the ground work, or the foundation for the development of any
disease. Even then, many times the specific bacteria fail to appear.
And in numerous other cases the bacteria fail to appear until very
late in the stage of the disease. If a cause is a cause, logically it
should be present in sufficient numbers before symptoms appear. It
cannot be demonstrated that bacteria invariably appear even after the
development of a particular disease.
What is the real reason
for Fredrick Stare’s change in feeling about vaccinations for
cholera? Probably, he was given a good lecture by the AMA. Thousands
of dollars will be lost to the American medical profession if people
do not get their immunizations before they leave home. So he
castigated his brethren physicians in other countries by telling his
public that it is important to avoid the dirty needles in other
countries. It would have been better to tell them the truth, that
they could rely on Article 83 of the World Health Organization and go
freely in other countries, as long as they let the health officials
know of their whereabouts. This way a painful shot could be avoided
as well as the occasional development of hepatitis from dirty needles
in this country.
Why the recent outburst
of cholera? An item under World Health News, in the September 1971,
Health For All (England), has a very good answer to this question. It
states: “Whenever there is a great social upheaval, with its tragic
displacement of people and the consequent crowding of refugees, there
is always a medical lesson to be learned. Disease often follows in
the wake of such catastrophes,
and, as with the most
recent one, cholera becomes almost epidemic. According to medical
opinion, the causative organism in this case is the spirillum
cholerae which is found in the stools of patients. Entry into the
body is through the alimentary tract, and the source of the infection
is polluted water due to a lack of sanitation. To say that the
organism is the cause of the disease is, however, to put the cart
before the horse. The course of events runs in this order; First the
breakdown of social order; then the panic of the population; and then
the crowding of the people with the absence of sanitation, with the
development of the organism as an associated factor. In this country,
as history tells, cholera was widespread whenever people were crowded
together and there was a lack of proper sanitation.
“It is interesting to
notice that whenever there is a cholera outbreak, the headlines in
the newspapers are given over the use of vaccines, to which, also,
credit is generally afforded when the epidemic comes under control.
The vaccines are rushed from the great pharmaceutical centres with
the accompaniment of massive publicity with the result that probably
99 persons out of 100 would affirm the vaccines were effective in
controlling the situation.
“It would therefore
have come as a surprise to many people to have read on the front page
of Medical News Tribune, June 11, 1971, the headline: ‘Medical
science helpless against cholera epidemic’ and to have learned that
‘medical science is virtually powerless in the face of the cholera
epidemic on the India-Pakistan border. Tropical medicine experts
can’t even estimate how many could die. Better sanitation is the
only answer, impossible in the present situation as millions of
Pakistani refugees exist in terrible conditions, aggravated by the
monsoon… .’ ”
Boyd’s textbook of
pathology states that, “The wise Chinese are the only Orientals who
do not suffer from cholera; they use boiled water and cooked food,
they drink tea and eat hot rice.” We have had personal talks with
Scott Nearing, who also said that cholera was virtually wiped out in
China, but this is attributed to better sanitation and better diets
for the Chinese and not due to the fact that everything they eat or
drink is boiled or cooked. They have habits of moderation in all
things and do not eat extensively of flesh foods.
It is a well-known fact
that the Chinese have used human wastes for many centuries for
fertilizer. They are still using this method of fertilization. It
isn’t the boiling or cooking of their foods that protects them; it
is the fact that they have a better economy than many years ago, and
their people are better fed than previously.
Recently, in Organic
Gardening and Farming, an article entitled “Goodbye to the Flush
Toilet” pictures the use of human wastes as very ecological and
necessary. It demonstrates how unclean our system of purifying water
is, and how “even the most modern of sewage plants don’t do a
perfect job of taking that one part of human excrement out of toilet
water.” This dirty water, even though sterile, is, sent back into
the reservoirs for us to drink and wash vegetables in. It clearly
shows that the disposal of body wastes is actually cleaner when done
the old-fashioned way, by bacteria and filtration through soil. The
article states that “clearly, the soil does a much better job of
purification than any sewage plant.”
The aforementioned
article quotes from Dr. F. H. King’s book, Farmers of Forty
Centuries, and shows that all animal wastes are recycled by the
Orientals. “Human wastes were almost the life-blood of Oriental
agriculture, Dr. King found. Farmers made attractive screens near
their fields so passersby would honor them by leaving behind some
human fertilizer. All families saved their toilet wastes and sold
them to farmers. Cities found their human wastes to be a net profit
instead of a liability, as in the U.S. In 1908 Shanghai sold one
Chinese contractor 78,000 tons of human waste for $31,000 in gold.”
It just goes to show
you that it is not the method of fertilization that harms people. If
one fears the vibrio, it may help to know that cholera vibrio can
survive in sewage for only 24 hours and if the sewage is well
composted before using it as fertilizer, there will be no live
vibrios to fear.
Cholera is nothing more
than a very severe diarrhea commencing high in the intestinal tract.
The fluids that are lost during the diarrhea are secreted by the
intestinal membranes to rid the food tube of very poisonous and
irritating substances, which are not the vibrios. Overeating and
drinking with the consequent putrefaction of proteins, producing
virulent poisons high up in the small intestine are the causes of the
diarrhea. It is a disease of poisoning, and because it develops high
in the digestive tube, many electrolytes and fluids are lost. This is
the danger. But if no food is taken when a malaise is first felt, and
the body is permitted to wash the intestines free of the poison, and
fear is kept from the patient, and he is freely supplied water when
he is thirsty and can retain it, there will be a recovery rate much
greater than now.
Graham states in his
book on cholera “that the primary and paramount cause (of cholera)
is always the peculiar condition of the human system resulting from
the violation of the laws of organic life. Its more immediate
exciting causes, however, are various; such as atmospheric changes
and conditions—quality and quantity of food—excesses of every
kind; but more than all, perhaps the use of artificial stimulants,
and especially of the narcotic and alcoholic kinds;—in short,
anything and everything that reduces the vital powers of the nerves
of organic life; and brings the alimentary canal and with it the
whole system into a state of extreme, morbid irritability, leaving
little power in the system to sustain high irritation, and to resist
and throw off things that are noxious or disturbing to it.
“It may, however,
with confidence be asserted, that all the causes which obtain, beyond
the control of man, would seldom or never develop this disease
without the occurrence of those causes which operate through his
voluntary conduct.“
Instead of indulging in
beer and wine, and much coffee and cooked food while traveling, if
you do the
very opposite of this
ancient and harmful advice you will be more likely to have a healthy
vacation.
# in the intestinal
tract. The fluids that are lost during the diarrhea are secreted by
the intestinal membranes to rid the food tube of very poisonous and
irritating substances, which are not the vibrios. Overeating and
drinking with the consequent putrefaction of proteins, producing
virulent poisons high up in the small intestine are the causes of the
diarrhea. It is a disease of poisoning, and because it develops high
in the digestive tube, many electrolytes and fluids are lost. This is
the danger. But if no food is taken when a malaise is first felt, and
the body is permitted to wash the intestines free of the poison, and
fear is kept from the patient, and he is freely supplied water when
he is thirsty and can retain it, there will be a recovery rate much
greater than now.
Note: Think of this
when you hear about immunization and people needing vaccinations.
by Virginia Vetrano,
B.S., D.C.
Worried people call the
Health School asking if they should have themselves immunized before
traveling abroad. They are going to the Far East or Mexico, and
should they beware of fresh fruits and vegetables? Is it true that
they must drink wine or beer, and shun pure water?
These and other
questions come to their mind when preparing for a visit to other
countries. They have heard so many scare stories written by the
masters of the scare science that they take a trip with great fear
and trepidation. Indeed, some remain home for, fear of “catching”
some foreign “bug.”
On January 4, 1971, the
Arkansas Gazette carried an article by Dr. Van Dellen alarming the
people that a cholera epidemic was spreading through the Middle and
Far East, into Africa. “For the first time in 100 years the disease
has bridged the Sahara and is in tropical Africa and as far west as
Guinea. These areas are densely populated and have poor
sanitation—ideal conditions for the spread of the infection. The
mortality also has been high.
He goes on to say that
the cholera poses “no immediate threat to the United States,” but
he says this “with his fingers crossed, because any person visiting
afflicted countries could bring it back.” Then those stow-away
germs could pounce on us poor unsuspecting Americans who would then
succumb to the disease.
Where was the cholera
vibrio all these years? Did it disappear and suddenly return?
Travelers are advised to consult the United States Public Health
Service to determine which countries demand that they be immunized
for cholera before entering, making it sound as if many countries
demand immunization for this disease before crossing their frontiers.
This is not so. Dr. Van Dellen states in the aforementioned article
that, “Many countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa demand evidence
of vaccination before a person crosses their frontiers. And this is
true particularly after the person has been in a cholera-infected
area.”
I telephoned the United
States Public Health Service and was told that it is not necessary to
be immunized before going into an infected area; that the countries
did not care if you were subjected to the disease when there. It is
the other countries that worried when you re-entered them on your way
home. I was advised that before making a world trip that one should
be immunized for smallpox, cholera, yellow fever, tetanus, typhoid,
polio, and hepatitis. Then one month before entering a
malaria-infested area I was told to start taking medication and
continue taking it as long as there was a chance of being bitten by
the malaria-carrying mosquito.
The World Health
Organization, Geneva, is the responsible body for the International
Sanitary Regulations. It is clear in Article 83, for all those
countries that accept the International Sanitary Regulations, that
“objectors to vaccination can refuse the operations without being
refused admission into those countries which have accepted the
International Sanitary Regulations.”
If you have traveled
into Asia, Africa, America, other than from the United States and
Canada, and wish to enter the United Kingdom, an official vaccination
certificate is necessary. In almost all countries, however, you can
get in without shots of any kind. It is when you re-enter other
countries from an infected area that trouble may be given you.
Paul-Emile Chevrefils, M.D., founder president of La Ligue Pour Le
Vaccine Libre states that he travels without the yellow certificate,
using only Article 83. He states that, “This international by-law
gives anyone the right to go around the world by using the medical
surveillance for 15 days, not to be isolated but to go freely.“
After informing his
readers that “there is no good evidence that cholera immunizations
are any good …” Fredrick J. Stare, M.D. (Arkansas Gazette,
November 16, 1970) urges us to be shot anyway, and then gives us a
formula for eating that will supposedly prevent cholera. Do what he
says and you probably will develop cholera. Do the exact opposite of
his advice which follows and you will probably have more energy,
enjoy yourself more and not be troubled whatsoever with “vacation
diarrhea.”
Stare, according to the
dictates of the infection myth, gives us this advice: Stick to
bottled mineral water, hot tea or coffee, or bottled beer, eat the
meat, potatoes, rice, or other well-cooked foods, canned vegetables,
bread, butter, and jam; and shun the fruits and vegetables unless you
can readily peel them yourself. Wash your hands well before you eat.”
This nonsensical plan
of eating supposedly prevents the development of cholera by killing
the vibrio with heat or chemical processes before introducing it into
the body via food and water. Were the vibrio the cause of cholera his
reasoning would still be specious. Vibrio cholerae are aerobic
bacteria, meaning that air is necessary for their growth. There is
not an excess of air in the gastrointestinal system. They are also
killed by acidity. If food and water, contaminated by vibrio cholera
are taken, the acid of any good stomach will soon destroy them.
Kendall A. Elson, M.D. states in Cyclopedia of Medicine, that, “The
cholera vibrio escapes from the body of the infected individual in
stools and vomitus, although if the latter is strongly acid the
organisms are immediately killed.”
What people should be
taught is cleanliness, and to eat moderately of properly-combined
foods so that digestion is normal and they need not fear the cholera
vibrio, if they still believe the concept of disease of the shaman.
We must caution our readers against Stare’s Middle Ages advice. The
cholera vibrio does not cause cholera.
Even though he has
twice made the statement that cholera immunizations do not protect
one from cholera, Stare advises getting immunized anyway to avoid
trouble at ports of entry to other countries which have strict public
health regulations. He condemns his peers, who are M.D.s who give the
shots when he says, “It is important to have this certificate in
order to avoid inconveniences in travel or the threat of serum
hepatitis from a dirty vaccinating needle.”
To back up his
statements about cholera vaccine, Stare quotes Dr. W. B. Greenough,
III, whom he says “knows far more about cholera than I know or ever
will know,” as having written him the following: “Many commercial
vaccines do not protect even in populations from endemic areas (where
cholera is always present) … as a measure for disease control
immunization is ineffective since the carrier state is not interfered
with by the vaccine.”
What he is saying in
plain English is that if the cholera vaccine protected, then cholera
would not be endemic, and those who were protected would not develop
the disease even if supposed “carriers” are present. However, we
are taught that the “organisms usually disappear from the stools of
the cholera patient within five to seven days of the onset of
infection. …” and the carrier state is not supposed to be a
significant method of transmission of the disease. Cecil and Loeb’s
textbook of medicine states “there are no known instances of
chronic carriers among human beings.”
Many Hygienists have
traveled to the Middle and Far East and into Africa, eating plenty of
fresh fruits and vegetables, without developing any trouble, whereas
often those who had all the shots and who drank wine instead of water
and who didn’t dare taste a fresh fruit or vegetable came down with
various illnesses, including cholera. I might add, that for the sake
of cleanliness, pure distilled water would be best to drink, here or
overseas, and for absolute cleanliness of vegetables and fruits,
rinse them well in distilled water. The cholera vibrio is easily
killed by drying, and it dies rapidly in pure water. It is
cleanliness that is necessary, not sterility.
Cholera, an acute
inflammation of the intestinal canal, is supposedly spread by food
and water contaminated with vibrio cholerae. It is usually a disease
endemic and epidemic in Asia primarily along the Ganges River in
India and Pakistan. The bacillus, which is shaped like a comma, and
was called the comma bacillus by Koch, its discoverer, releases a
powerful endotoxin after death, which contains a mucinase. Mucinase
is thought to be responsible for the extreme cellular desquamation of
the mucosal epithelium that is so characteristic a feature of
cholera. The endotoxin supposedly causes such intense dilatation of
all the capillaries along the whole intestinal tract that the fluid
leaks out of these into the intestines, thus producing the rice-water
stools so typical of Asiatic cholera. Because of the loss of such
huge quantities of electrolytes and water, extreme dehydration
ensues, and Boyd states that 75% of the untreated patients die.
Since the vibrio
cholera does such horrible things to a person, by all means,
shouldn’t we take steps to prevent infection? These threats could
scare one into being immunized despite the poor reports of
immunization, before going to the Middle and Far East. Who wants to
dehydrate and die? So we become immunized and avoid all fresh foods,
hoping that we won’t develop the disease.
Germs by themselves do
not cause disease. Dr. Pettenkofer, Professor of Bacteriology at the
University of Vienna, astounded all his students one day by drinking
a glass of water containing millions of living cholera bacilli. He
had come to the conclusion that germs do not cause disease, and
wanted to prove it. As he gulped down a glassful of living vibrio,
the bearded Dr. Pettenkofer only growled, “Now let us see if I get
cholera.” De Kruif said that Dr. Pettenkofer drank enough of the
“wiggling comma germs to infect a regiment.” Nothing happened to
the “mad” Pettenkofer. Many incidents could be cited showing that
infecting the body with germs does not cause any specific disease to
develop. Perhaps this is why the president was persuaded to dump
stockpiles of germs for germ warfare. Perhaps experiments proved them
useless and physicians didn’t want the lucrative germ theory
destroyed just yet. If germ warfare were effective, it is hardly
likely that he would have disposed of the stockpile.
As far back 1928, Dr.
M. Beddow Dayly, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., Medical World, said: “I am
prepared to maintain, with scientifically established facts, that in
no single instance has it been conclusively proved that any
microorganism is the specific cause of a disease.”
In Volume VI of the
Hygienic System, Dr. Shelton says: “In more than sixty years of
intensive farming the germ idea, there is not one ‘disease’ that
has been proved to be of germ origin, and not one can be cured
according to the germ theory. Unless a germ will cause a disease
every time it infects the body, it is not a cause. A cause must be as
constant and specific in its influence, or it is not a cause. Germs
are omnipresent—this is one of the fundamental truths Pasteur or
his contemporary, Bechamp, discovered; but he and his followers
appear to have overlooked the fact that germs fail to have a specific
influence all the time.”
Dr. Shelton further
says: “The view I would put before the reader is that ‘disease’
is not caused by the germ, but by the state of the body that allows
the germ to flourish. And this condition of the organism or any part
of it which renders possible the growth of the germ therein is the
much sought for ‘filterable virus.’ It is the outgrowth of
violations of the laws of life and is no chance or haphazard
condition.”
Dr. Tilden says that
germs are merely adventitious—secondary. If the soil is proper for
the growth of bacteria, they will flourish but if tissues and
secretions are normal and healthy, pathological germs will not grow
and multiply.
Those who travel and
drink alcoholic beverages, smoke, keep late hours, overeat on spicy,
cooked dishes, and sight-see until they are about to drop are
enervating themselves. They are using up nerve energy in excess.
Functions begin to lag. Metabolic waste products mount in the tissues
and fluids of the body. Secretion and excretion are impaired. This is
the ground work, or the foundation for the development of any
disease. Even then, many times the specific bacteria fail to appear.
And in numerous other cases the bacteria fail to appear until very
late in the stage of the disease. If a cause is a cause, logically it
should be present in sufficient numbers before symptoms appear. It
cannot be demonstrated that bacteria invariably appear even after the
development of a particular disease.
What is the real reason
for Fredrick Stare’s change in feeling about vaccinations for
cholera? Probably, he was given a good lecture by the AMA. Thousands
of dollars will be lost to the American medical profession if people
do not get their immunizations before they leave home. So he
castigated his brethren physicians in other countries by telling his
public that it is important to avoid the dirty needles in other
countries. It would have been better to tell them the truth, that
they could rely on Article 83 of the World Health Organization and go
freely in other countries, as long as they let the health officials
know of their whereabouts. This way a painful shot could be avoided
as well as the occasional development of hepatitis from dirty needles
in this country.
Why the recent outburst
of cholera? An item under World Health News, in the September 1971,
Health For All (England), has a very good answer to this question. It
states: “Whenever there is a great social upheaval, with its tragic
displacement of people and the consequent crowding of refugees, there
is always a medical lesson to be learned. Disease often follows in
the wake of such catastrophes,
and, as with the most
recent one, cholera becomes almost epidemic. According to medical
opinion, the causative organism in this case is the spirillum
cholerae which is found in the stools of patients. Entry into the
body is through the alimentary tract, and the source of the infection
is polluted water due to a lack of sanitation. To say that the
organism is the cause of the disease is, however, to put the cart
before the horse. The course of events runs in this order; First the
breakdown of social order; then the panic of the population; and then
the crowding of the people with the absence of sanitation, with the
development of the organism as an associated factor. In this country,
as history tells, cholera was widespread whenever people were crowded
together and there was a lack of proper sanitation.
“It is interesting to
notice that whenever there is a cholera outbreak, the headlines in
the newspapers are given over the use of vaccines, to which, also,
credit is generally afforded when the epidemic comes under control.
The vaccines are rushed from the great pharmaceutical centres with
the accompaniment of massive publicity with the result that probably
99 persons out of 100 would affirm the vaccines were effective in
controlling the situation.
“It would therefore
have come as a surprise to many people to have read on the front page
of Medical News Tribune, June 11, 1971, the headline: ‘Medical
science helpless against cholera epidemic’ and to have learned that
‘medical science is virtually powerless in the face of the cholera
epidemic on the India-Pakistan border. Tropical medicine experts
can’t even estimate how many could die. Better sanitation is the
only answer, impossible in the present situation as millions of
Pakistani refugees exist in terrible conditions, aggravated by the
monsoon… .’ ”
Boyd’s textbook of
pathology states that, “The wise Chinese are the only Orientals who
do not suffer from cholera; they use boiled water and cooked food,
they drink tea and eat hot rice.” We have had personal talks with
Scott Nearing, who also said that cholera was virtually wiped out in
China, but this is attributed to better sanitation and better diets
for the Chinese and not due to the fact that everything they eat or
drink is boiled or cooked. They have habits of moderation in all
things and do not eat extensively of flesh foods.
It is a well-known fact
that the Chinese have used human wastes for many centuries for
fertilizer. They are still using this method of fertilization. It
isn’t the boiling or cooking of their foods that protects them; it
is the fact that they have a better economy than many years ago, and
their people are better fed than previously.
Recently, in Organic
Gardening and Farming, an article entitled “Goodbye to the Flush
Toilet” pictures the use of human wastes as very ecological and
necessary. It demonstrates how unclean our system of purifying water
is, and how “even the most modern of sewage plants don’t do a
perfect job of taking that one part of human excrement out of toilet
water.” This dirty water, even though sterile, is, sent back into
the reservoirs for us to drink and wash vegetables in. It clearly
shows that the disposal of body wastes is actually cleaner when done
the old-fashioned way, by bacteria and filtration through soil. The
article states that “clearly, the soil does a much better job of
purification than any sewage plant.”
The aforementioned
article quotes from Dr. F. H. King’s book, Farmers of Forty
Centuries, and shows that all animal wastes are recycled by the
Orientals. “Human wastes were almost the life-blood of Oriental
agriculture, Dr. King found. Farmers made attractive screens near
their fields so passersby would honor them by leaving behind some
human fertilizer. All families saved their toilet wastes and sold
them to farmers. Cities found their human wastes to be a net profit
instead of a liability, as in the U.S. In 1908 Shanghai sold one
Chinese contractor 78,000 tons of human waste for $31,000 in gold.”
It just goes to show
you that it is not the method of fertilization that harms people. If
one fears the vibrio, it may help to know that cholera vibrio can
survive in sewage for only 24 hours and if the sewage is well
composted before using it as fertilizer, there will be no live
vibrios to fear.
Cholera is nothing more
than a very severe diarrhea commencing high in the intestinal tract.
The fluids that are lost during the diarrhea are secreted by the
intestinal membranes to rid the food tube of very poisonous and
irritating substances, which are not the vibrios. Overeating and
drinking with the consequent putrefaction of proteins, producing
virulent poisons high up in the small intestine are the causes of the
diarrhea. It is a disease of poisoning, and because it develops high
in the digestive tube, many electrolytes and fluids are lost. This is
the danger. But if no food is taken when a malaise is first felt, and
the body is permitted to wash the intestines free of the poison, and
fear is kept from the patient, and he is freely supplied water when
he is thirsty and can retain it, there will be a recovery rate much
greater than now.
Graham states in his
book on cholera “that the primary and paramount cause (of cholera)
is always the peculiar condition of the human system resulting from
the violation of the laws of organic life. Its more immediate
exciting causes, however, are various; such as atmospheric changes
and conditions—quality and quantity of food—excesses of every
kind; but more than all, perhaps the use of artificial stimulants,
and especially of the narcotic and alcoholic kinds;—in short,
anything and everything that reduces the vital powers of the nerves
of organic life; and brings the alimentary canal and with it the
whole system into a state of extreme, morbid irritability, leaving
little power in the system to sustain high irritation, and to resist
and throw off things that are noxious or disturbing to it.
“It may, however,
with confidence be asserted, that all the causes which obtain, beyond
the control of man, would seldom or never develop this disease
without the occurrence of those causes which operate through his
voluntary conduct.“
Instead of indulging in
beer and wine, and much coffee and cooked food while traveling, if
you do the
very opposite of this
ancient and harmful advice you will be more likely to have a healthy
vacation.
In the intestinal
tract the fluids that are lost during the diarrhea are secreted by
the intestinal membranes to rid the food tube of very poisonous and
irritating substances, which are not the vibrios. Overeating and
drinking with the consequent putrefaction of proteins, producing
virulent poisons high up in the small intestine are the causes of the
diarrhea. It is a disease of poisoning, and because it develops high
in the digestive tube, many electrolytes and fluids are lost. This is
the danger. But if no food is taken when a malaise is first felt, and
the body is permitted to wash the intestines free of the poison, and
fear is kept from the patient, and he is freely supplied water when
he is thirsty and can retain it, there will be a recovery rate much
greater than now.
No comments:
Post a Comment